Skip to main content

A Letter from TAU President Welcoming the New Academic Year

“May the hostages come back, the wounded heal, and the displaced return to their homes”.

This week, we begin the 2024-5 academic year, against the backdrop of the bloody war that rages on, and while we still lack a clear sense of how this war will unfold, particularly in relation to Iran.

The anguish over the hostages weighs heavily on us all. It’s hard to believe that over a year after the horrific disaster of October 7, many hostages are still languishing in the hellish tunnels of Gaza, with the bodies of many others held there as bargaining chips. We cannot win this war without bringing everyone home. Added to this is the daily sorrow and mourning for our soldiers, including members of our university community, who have fallen or been injured while defending us, as well as for the civilians who have fallen victim to terrorist acts across Israel. Our concern for the soldiers on the front lines and the tens of thousands of Israelis in the South and North–who either remain vulnerably in their homes or were displaced by circumstances–is unrelenting.

Yet, we have no other country, and fight for it we must. This is what the parents and grandparents of many of us did even before the establishment of Israel, and now it’s our turn. Our extraordinary young generation, with so many risking their lives on the battlefield, places a weighty responsibility on us, the older generation. What are we doing, as a university, and what more must we do in this crucial period?

One of our primary tasks, both last year and this year, is to do everything in our power to ensure that the reservist soldiers studying with us, as well as students who are spouses of soldiers, can complete the academic year successfully. Last year, we provided financial, academic, and emotional support and we will continue to do so this year as well. The emergency fund we established with the help of friends of the university in Israel and around the world has greatly assisted us in this endeavor.

Second, we succeeded last year in containing tensions on campus triggered by the war while maintaining a democratic space and protecting the human and civil rights of everyone. Members of our university community, Jews and Arabs, left-leaning and right-leaning, are equally dear to us. Open and free discussion on any topic is the essence of academia, and we will uphold this principle this year as well.

Third, a primary mission we are focused on is bringing as many Israeli researchers studying abroad back to Tel Aviv University as we have done in previous years. These researchers represent the next generation of academia; they embody the scientific and humanistic pursuits without which we have no future. Israel may seem less attractive to some of them at present, but I am confident that we will weather this crisis and emerge stronger.

Fourth, the growing boycott of Israeli academia worldwide (BDS) affects us all. Universities across the country have united and are working collaboratively to mitigate the impact of the boycott through legal and other means. We’ve had some successes, but there is still a long way to go.

Fifth, from October 7 to this day, the university–as an institution and as a community–has been involved in numerous volunteer activities. Days after October 7, our community members volunteered in the South and North, both in their areas of expertise and in agriculture and other manual work. We will continue to do so this coming year, hopefully in collaboration with local authorities in the South and North. A few months after the war broke out, we established the Post-Trauma Center, treating hundreds of people, both civilians and soldiers. Here, too, the generous financial support of our friends in Israel and abroad has been invaluable.

Sixth, we will continue to defend academic freedom and the autonomy of universities in Israel against those who seek to harm them. Academic freedom is essential for free thought, intellectually challenging education, and groundbreaking research. Without these, we will become a third-world country. I assure you that I will protect our academic freedom as one of my most cherished values.

These are the special missions that characterize this period. But equally important:  last year, we carried on teaching and doing research as if – or almost as if – there were no war. We, the university and Israel as a whole, do not have the privilege to stop “producing” doctors, engineers, psychologists, social workers, scientists, and humanist intellectuals. Nor do we have the privilege to stop advancing research. This is the source of our resilience, the safeguard of our future, and we cannot forsake it, not in times of peace and certainly not in times of war.

I thank you all – academic and administrative staff – for your hard work this past year to meet the challenges we set for ourselves, and our friends in Israel and abroad – for your generous support of the University and Israel.  And to you, our students – thank you for your patience with us. We are doing our utmost so that you derive the maximum benefit, and hopefully some enjoyment, from studying at Tel Aviv University.

I wish you a successful year, and may peace and tranquility return to our land. May the hostages come back, the wounded heal, and the displaced return to their homes.

Yours always,

Ariel Porat

TAU President

TAU Breakthrough Reveals Mechanism That Eliminates Tumors

Researchers identified a mechanism that eliminates tumors—even those resistant to immunotherapy.

A technological breakthrough by medical researchers at Tel Aviv University enabled the discovery of a cancer mechanism that prevents the immune system from attacking tumors. The researchers were surprised to find that reversing this mechanism stimulates the immune system to fight the cancer cells, even in types of cancer considered resistant to prevailing forms of immunotherapy. The breakthrough was led by Prof. Carmit Levy, Prof. Yaron Carmi, and PhD student Avishai Maliah from TAU’s Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences. The paper was published in the leading journal Nature Communications.

Prof. Levy: “It all happened by coincidence. My lab studies both cancer and the effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun on our skin and body – both of which are known to suppress the immune system. Cancer suppresses approaching immune cells and solar radiation suppresses the skin’s immune system. While in most cases, we cancer researchers worldwide focus on the tumor and look for mechanisms by which cancer inhibits the immune system, here we proposed a different approach: investigating how UV exposure suppresses the immune system and applying our findings to cancer. The discovery of a mechanism that inhibits the immune system opens new paths for innovative therapies”.

What Surprising Findings Emerged from the Research?

Prof. Levy adds: “With this idea in mind, I asked my colleague Prof. Yaron Carmi, a global expert on the immune system, to join the study. Avishai Maliah, an MD/PhD candidate in my lab, led the project. The first stage was a comprehensive investigation of changes in the skin induced by exposure to UV, using a mouse model. Avishai examined the behavior of dozens of proteins post-UV exposure and surprisingly discovered a significant rise in the level of a relatively unexplored protein called Ly6a. This unexpected finding led us to investigate further, to understand the protein function and whether it is involved in the immune suppression process”.

Prof. Carmi explains: “It’s important to understand a basic aspect of the immune system’s function. Our natural immune system is very efficient and very powerful, but it contains quite a few brakes and controls, to prevent overactivity that can cause autoimmune diseases – in which the body attacks itself. When our skin is exposed to UV radiation from the sun, our immune system responds immediately: blood vessels expand, DNA is repaired wherever possible, and cells with mutations are identified and removed. At the same time, a strong control system with numerous brakes is also activated to prevent overactivity”.

How Does UV Exposure Affect Immune Response?

Prof. Levy: “The use of sunlight to suppress autoimmune diseases of the skin – when the skin’s immune system overreacts – has been known for years. Phototherapy is basically the application of UV radiation to treat patients with autoimmune diseases, such as psoriasis, vitiligo and more, because ultimately UV suppresses the skin’s immune system”.

Avishai Maliah: “We found that after exposure to UV radiation, the immune system’s T cells – that play a critical role in fighting cancer – begin to express high levels of the protein Ly6a. We suspected that Ly6a serves as a brake through which UV inhibits the immune system, and that by releasing this brake, optimal activation of the immune system might be resumed”.

Prof. Levy: “We were surprised to discover that this protein, Ly6a, is also overexpressed in cancer tumors – apparently inhibiting T cells. Having found this in two types of cancer, melanoma skin cancer and colon cancer, we have reason to believe that the same thing happens in other cancers as well. Evidently, we have discovered a general mechanism through which cancer tumors desensitize the immune system. Avishai treated cancer with Ly6a antibodies, and amazingly the tumors were significantly reduced. Moreover, cancers resistant to known treatments reacted substantially to Ly6a antibodies”. The new discovery can have practical implications in immunotherapy – treating cancer by enhancing the response of the immune system.

Prof. Carmi: “Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of cancer. However, about 50% of the patients do not respond to the currently prevailing treatment – the protein PD1. We discovered a new protein, Ly6a, and found that its antibody eradicated tumors in our model animals – even those resistant to PD1 therapy. We are currently working to translate our findings into a drug for human cancer patients, hoping to offer an effective new treatment”.

 

Prof. Beatriz Magaloni: 2024 BMI Prize Laureate

Congratulations to Prof. Magaloni on winning the esteemed 2024 BMI prize.

The Faculty of Social Sciences at Tel Aviv University has announced that it is awarding the 2024 BMI Prize to Prof. Beatriz Magaloni from Stanford University, in recognition of her significant contributions to the study of authoritarianism. This esteemed prize is presented annually by the The Boris Mints Institute for Strategic Policy Solutions to Global Challenges and highlights the impact of a senior researcher’s work in specific academic fields.

Prof. Beatriz Magaloni is a distinguished scholar in political science, renowned for her groundbreaking research on autocratic regimes and their electoral processes. She holds the position of Graham H. Stuart Professor of International Relations and is a Senior Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University. Her work has become foundational in understanding multi-party autocracies, which are increasingly prevalent forms of governance globally.

Prof. Magaloni’s research addresses critical questions regarding why autocratic regimes opt for multi-party elections and the implications of these elections for democracy. She elucidates the nuanced threats posed by civilian leaders who ascend to power through electoral means rather than military coups, offering vital insights into electoral behavior and regime stability.

Throughout her career, Prof. Magaloni has published extensively in leading journals, including the American Political Science Review and World Development. Her work is widely assigned in graduate and undergraduate courses, shaping the academic agenda for studies in comparative politics.

The award will be presented to Prof. Magaloni at the joint BMI-University of Donja Gorica Conference in Podgorica, Montenegro, on November 25th.

For further information about Prof. Beatriz Magaloni and her research, visit her profiles on Stanford University and the Carnegie Endowment.

Let Them Migrate in Peace

Migratory birds in times of war.

Israel, a stopover for over 500 million migratory birds heading to warmer lands, has been at war on multiple fronts for a year. As these birds migrate south, they face not only the usual dangers but also added risks from fighter jets, missiles, and UAVs along their northern arrival routes and southern destinations.

Prof. Yossi Leshem from the School of Zoology at the George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences has studied birds, especially migratory ones, for over 50 years. He began tracking their flight paths in Israel 40 years ago using a glider, observing their spring migration from Egypt to Lebanon and autumn route southward. This work allowed him to map their arrival times, flight altitudes, and the effects of weather on their behavior.

Flying with the Birds (Photo: Eyal Bartov).

In the 1980s, he pioneered radar use in Israel to study bird migration, working with the Israeli Air Force to reduce mid-air collisions between military aircraft and birds. We asked him how the current conflict impacts migratory birds and whether solutions exist to protect both human and avian lives.

Can Radar Distinguish Between Birds and Aircraft?

“A radar is an electronic device that sends out electromagnetic waves. If there’s something in the air, the waves bounce back, indicating distance and azimuth. The larger the bird, the stronger the radar signal. Large birds like raptors, pelicans, storks, or cranes are at greater risk, posing the most significant danger to Air Force planes”, explains Prof. Leshem.

לעשות הכל כדי למנוע התנגשות אווירית איתם. שקנאים בתעופת "מבנה מכונס" בנדידת הסתיו (צילום: אהרון שמשון)

Doing everything to prevent an air collision with them. Pelicans in tight formation during their autumn migration (Photo: Aharon Shimshon).

“Today, it’s understood that larger birds generally fly over land to use thermals (warm air rising from the ground). Based on their speed, we can often identify flocks of birds. We can track migratory birds on radar up to 80-90 kilometers away”, says Prof. Leshem. However, since the war began and UAVs from Lebanon started appearing, distinguishing birds from hostile aircraft has become more challenging.

“During autumn, migration comes through Europe, Turkey, Lebanon, and down through Israel—the same route used by missiles and UAVs. They come from the same direction, height, and azimuth”. According to Prof. Leshem, this has led to four main challenges: additional pressure on air defense and the air force, which must quickly decide if there is a true threat or if cranes are merely passing by; stress for civilians prompted by alert systems when stork flocks fly overhead; harm to wildlife entering Israeli airspace; and substantial financial costs of interception missiles and air force resources”. Nonetheless, Prof. Leshem reveals that efforts are underway to develop a system that can differentiate between birds and UAVs, which will save countless bird lives.

מגינה על תושבי ישראל ומסוכנת לציפורים. מערכת כיפת ברזל

Protecting Israel’s Residents, Endangering Its Birds: The Iron Dome System.

How is the War Affecting Local Birds?

It’s not just migratory birds suffering from the consequences of war. Prof. Leshem leads a project in collaboration with the Ministry of Agriculture and the Society for the Protection of Nature, using barn owls and kestrels for natural rodent control in agricultural areas to reduce pesticide use. There are about 5,000 nesting boxes nationwide, supported by hundreds of farmers who receive professional assistance. The project now includes ten Middle Eastern countries and has recently welcomed Georgia, Ukraine, and Germany, fostering cross-border cooperation.

Prof. Leshem explains that barn owls typically lay between 5 to 12 eggs annually, depending on food availability. “However, the war has significantly reduced nesting and egg-laying in conflict zones in the north and south, where burned fields have impacted rodent populations. Fewer chicks this year will lead to a smaller barn owl population next year, resulting in long-term effects”.

מלכודת מוות למכרסמים - הפסקת אספקת מזון לעופות הדורסים. שדות שרופים ביישובי עוטף עזה

A Death Trap for Rodents – A Cut in Food Supply for Birds of Prey: Burned Fields in the Gaza Border Area.

Will the Impact on Birds Affect the Entire Ecological Balance?

“Absolutely, the impact on birds is affecting the entire ecological balance in several ways. From small songbirds to larger migratory birds like storks, each species plays a crucial role in the ecosystem. For example, the black-headed bunting migrates from this region to Africa in the fall, crossing the Sahara Desert, and depends on the insects in our fields and surroundings to build up enough fat reserves for the journey. If these fields aren’t providing enough food, the bunting may seek other locations, leading to an increase in insects in our agricultural areas, which can harm local crops”.

“Additionally, storks, which arrive here in large numbers and help control rodent populations by preying on voles in flooded fields, are essential for maintaining this balance. If these storks don’t arrive, farmers may face increased rodent populations, which can damage crops. So, if birds don’t receive the ecological support they need here, the local balance will likely shift significantly, bringing widespread environmental consequences for agriculture, species diversity, and our overall environmental health”, he explains.

בדרך לאפריקה עוצר לתדלק בישראל. גיבתון שחור ראש

On its way to Africa, stopping to refuel in Israel: the Black-headed Bunting.

Will Migration Patterns Shift Due to War?

“Migration has been occurring for hundreds of thousands of years, and it won’t change quickly,” assures Professor Leshem. “However, it could impact survival chances. In a typical winter, about 50,000 cranes spend the season in the Hula Valley, but last year only 15,000 arrived. Some birds, like storks, birds of prey, and pelicans, stop here for just a night or two to ‘refuel’ before continuing their journey. If they can’t land in their usual spots due to burned fields or are scared off by gunfire, they may need to find other locations. This search could decrease their chances of successfully reaching their destination, affecting the larger migration cycle”.

עוד יגיעו ימים יפים. עשרות אלפי עגורים חורפים באגמון החולה (צילום: שירז פשניסקי)

Perhaps there will still be beautiful days ahead. Thousands of cranes in the Hula Lake (Photo: Shiraz Pashinsky).

Did Child Labor Fuel the Ancient Pottery Industry?

New finds uncover children’s pottery creations from 4,500 years ago.

Archaeologists from Tel Aviv University and the National Museum in Copenhagen analyzed 450 pottery vessels made in Tel Hama, a town at the edge of the Ebla Kingdom, one of the most important Syrian kingdoms in the Early Bronze Age (about 4,500 years ago). They found that two-thirds of the pottery vessels were made by children – starting at the ages of seven and eight. Along with children’s use for the kingdom’s needs, they also found evidence of the children’s independent creations outside the industrial framework, illustrating the spark of childhood even in early urban societies. The research was led by Dr. Akiva Sanders, a Dan David Fellow at the Entin Faculty of Humanities, Tel Aviv University. The findings were published in the journal Childhood in the Past.

Dr. Akiva Sanders.

Dr. Sanders: “Our research allows us a rare glimpse into the lives of children who lived in the area of ​​the Ebla Kingdom, one of the oldest kingdoms in the world. We discovered that at its peak, roughly from 2400 to 2000 BCE, the cities associated with the kingdom began to rely on child labor for the industrial production of pottery. The children worked in workshops starting at the age of seven, and were specially trained to create cups as uniformly as possible – which were used in the kingdom in everyday life and at royal banquets”.

As is well known, a person’s fingerprints do not change throughout their life. For this reason, the size of the palm can be roughly deduced by measuring the density of the margins of the fingerprint – and from the size of the palm, the age and sex of the person can estimated. The pottery from Tel Hama, on the southern border of the Kingdom of Ebla, was excavated in the 1930s, and since then has been kept in the National Museum in Denmark. From the analysis of the fingerprints of the pottery, it appears that most of them were made by children. In the city of Hama city, two-thirds of the pottery was made by children. The other third was created by older men.

“At the beginning of the Early Bronze Age, some of the world’s first city-kingdoms arose in the Levant and Mesopotamia,” says Dr. Sanders. “We wanted to use the fingerprints on the pottery to understand how processes such as urbanization and the centralization of government functions affected the demographics of the ceramic industry. In the town of Hama, an ancient center for the production of ceramics, we initially see potters around the age of 12 and 13, with half the potters being under 18, and with boys and girls in equal proportions. This statistic changed with the formation of the Kingdom of Ebla when we saw that potters started to produce more goblets for banquets. And since more and more alcohol-fueled feasts were held, the cups were frequently broken – and therefore more cups needed to be made. Not only did the Kingdom begin to rely more and more on child labor, but the children were trained to make the cups as similar as possible. This is a phenomenon we also see in the Industrial Revolution in Europe and America: it is very easy to control children and teach them specific movements to create standardization in handicrafts”.

However, there was one bright spot in the children’s lives: making tiny figurines and miniature vessels for themselves. “These children taught each other to make miniature figurines and vessels, without the involvement of the adults,” says Dr. Sanders. “It is safe to say that they were created by children – and probably including those skilled children from the cup-making workshops. It seems that in these figurines the children expressed their creativity and their imagination”.

“I Applied to Several Universities, But TAU’s Documentary Film Program Stood Out”

Kristoffer Brugada is now in his second year of the international MFA in Documentary Cinema at Tel Aviv University. Currently working on his final project, a documentary on gay conversion therapy in the Philippines, Brugada reflects on his time in the program and the valuable lessons he’s gained.

Choosing TAU

In 2022, Brugada was searching for a master’s program that would help him grow as a filmmaker. “I applied to several universities, but Tel Aviv University’s program stood out. When I compared the curriculum, it felt more comprehensive in terms of what they teach and the topics discussed in class,” he says. A scholarship from TAU was another deciding factor in his choice.

 

MFA class

The diversity of the class and the collaborative nature of the program were also a strong draw. “Our class was a mix of ages and backgrounds, from filmmakers to urban planners. We had heated discussions, especially in the ethics class, but we learned so much from each other. 

 

“Documentary filmmaking may be a solitary job, but making a film is a collaborative effort, and I loved that we supported each other.”

 

In addition, Brugada appreciates the progressive outlook of Tel Aviv University.

Refining Technique and Debating Ethics

As a filmmaker with 20 years of experience in TV production and independent documentaries, Brugada wasn’t new to the world of film. Yet, the program’s hands-on directing courses taught by top Israeli practitioners allowed him to experiment with new techniques and refine his craft. “I’ve done documentaries before, but the program pushed me to further develop my style. The directing courses gave me the freedom to experiment and find my voice,” he says. 

 

Throughout the program, Brugada did several creative assignments that allowed him to apply what he was learning. These projects involved shooting, editing, and directing his own films. One of his notable assignments was a documentary on the Filipino community in Tel Aviv. 

“I introduced my classmates to my culture through the Filipino workers here in Israel.” 

His project on the annual beauty pageants for caregivers, a beloved tradition from the Philippines that has made its way to Israel, was a hit with his classmates. “They found it fascinating how these caregivers, despite their hard work, still found joy in community events.”

 

Brugada’s short on beauty pageants in Israel 

The university provided equipment, including Sony FS5 cameras and editing suites, but Kristoffer brought his own gear, which allowed him to film more flexibly. 

 

“The equipment at the university is great. As a teacher back in the Philippines, I really appreciated the quality of the resources available at TAU.” 

 

As for the theoretical courses, the one on ethics in documentary filming stood out the most. The course focused on the responsibilities filmmakers have when dealing with real people: “We have to assess what we can show and how it impacts both the audience and the subjects. I really loved those discussions,” he recalls. The program’s emphasis on ethical considerations helped him navigate sensitive topics, like the subject of his final film, with care and respect.

On top of that, getting to know more about the Israeli cinema landscape and learning about new theories of documentary filmmaking was something Brugada liked a lot.

Bringing the Vision to Life

During the second year, students work on their final project, a documentary film that they create individually or in teams. Brugada’s project, Going Straight, tackles a sensitive topic of gay conversion therapy in the Philippines.

“I wanted the film to be a venue for discussion about extreme fundamentalism and giving grace, love, and understanding instead of judgment.”

 

During Pride March shoot in Tel Aviv

The topic has been on his mind since 2017, but it was at TAU that he found the support and resources to bring the project to life. 

“The university’s Blavatnik Fund gave me financial support to finish the film.”

TAU professors, including Ran Tal and Netalie Braun, provided guidance on how to shape the narrative and decide which scenes to include. “We had to present sample scenes to the final film committee, who then gave us advice on which direction to take. Their feedback was crucial in helping me refine the story,” he says.

Brugada (right) with fellow students during Cinematography class

Now in post-production stage, Brugada plans to submit Going Straight to international festivals, with hopes of premiering it at a top-tier event. 

“I want to show it to the world. It’s a story that needs to be told, and I’m grateful to TAU for giving me the support to tell it.”

 

Filmmaking, Teaching, and New Career Milestones

Brugada’s journey as a filmmaker doesn’t stop at the completion of his final project. In fact, he’s already sharing his knowledge and experience with the next generation of filmmakers. 

“I’ve been teaching documentary production, screenwriting, and television production for a while now.”

After finishing his MFA, he hopes to continue teaching, potentially at the master’s level, and is even considering pursuing a PhD.

In addition, Brugada has also been invited to serve on the jury at the prestigious Japan Prize, a festival focused on educational media. “It’s a great opportunity to engage with filmmakers from around the world and see the incredible work being done in the field of educational film and television,” he says.

 

With his film nearing completion, his teaching responsibilities growing, and exciting opportunities like the Japan Prize ahead, Kristoffer’s career as a filmmaker and educator shows no signs of slowing down. 

 

“I have other films that I shelved before that I would want to go back to and work on.” 

 

Brugada remains dedicated to his craft and passionate about the stories he tells, grateful for the experiences and support he’s found at Tel Aviv University.

Why Do Employees Keep Their Ideas from Their Bosses?

TAU research reveals that 1 in 4 employees hide their inventions from their employers.

A new study from the Coller School of Management at Tel Aviv University sheds light for the first time on an important issue in the business world: employees withholding their inventions from the companies they work for. Although the law and/or employment contracts typically grant organizations the rights to their employees’ inventions, invention withholding is quite common. It carries serious implications for businesses, especially in knowledge-intensive industries. The study reveals alarming data: one out of every four employees in commercial organizations has withheld an invention from their employer at least once. In many cases, this withholding is done deliberately, with the intent to use the invention after leaving the organization. The research was led by Dr. Sarit Erez, in collaboration with Prof. Yaniv Shani and Prof. Abraham Carmeli from the Coller School of Management at Tel Aviv University. The study was published in the prominent journal Academy of Management Perspectives.

Coller School of Management.

Dr. Erez explains: “Commercial organizations, particularly those in knowledge-intensive industries, encourage innovation among their employees, and their success largely depends on those employees coming up with groundbreaking inventions. To protect companies’ rights to these inventions, legal systems and standard employment contracts typically grant the employer ownership of inventions made by their employees, while requiring employees to disclose any invention they have come up with at work. This allows the employer to obtain patents and protect the invention. To increase employees’ motivation to disclose their inventions, many companies implement incentive systems, offering financial grants and/or recognition, such as badges of honor, to inventors. But at the end of the day, when an employee comes up with a new invention, they are faced with a behavioral dilemma: should they fulfill their legal obligation and disclose the invention to their employer, knowing they will lose ownership, or violate their obligation and hold on to the possibility of capitalizing on their invention outside the company? Indeed, it is a common scenario to see people leave one organization and either join another in the same field or even start their own company — often to develop an invention conceived in their previous workplace”.

 

Video Credit: Dr. Sarit Erez.

 

Who Really Owns the Work You Create?

Dr. Erez continues: “These types of cases often end up in court, where an employer sues a former employee — or their new employer — alleging that they are using an invention that the employee conceived while working for them and that the patent rightfully belongs to the original employer. Having practiced law in the private sector for about 20 years, I often represented employees, employers, or employee organizations in disputes of this type. It became evident that the legal tools currently used to address this issue are not the most effective approach. I used to believe that management tools were designed to increase employees’ willingness to disclose their inventions and reduce their tendency to withhold them could be far more effective. But when I looked for academic research on this subject, I found only a handful, and even those focused mainly on the withholding of inventions in academia rather than in commercial organizations. It became clear to me that the issue of withholding inventions, which is so vital to the growth of knowledge-driven companies, had not yet been thoroughly explored in management strategy. With this study, we aimed to shed light on this important phenomenon and begin to address it from a business perspective”.

For the study, the researchers distributed an anonymous online questionnaire, asking inventors to report whether they had ever withheld one or more inventions from their employers. Participants were also requested to describe the event, including its reasons and circumstances. A total of 199 valid responses were collected. Dr. Erez details the findings: “54 participants, or 27 percent of the respondents, reported withholding at least one invention from the organization in which they worked. Of these, 28 percent explicitly stated that they did so to develop the invention themselves after leaving the organization or bringing it as a sort of ‘dowry’ to their next employer. The others cited a variety of reasons, some psychological and some financial. These included an emotional attachment and sense of ownership over the invention as a personal creation; fear that someone else would take credit; conflict with their employer; lack of trust in management; dissatisfaction with pay; and the belief that they would not be adequately compensated for an invention that would profit the organization”.

Changing the Work Culture

In the next phase, the researchers developed a unique and validated measurement scale, the first of its kind, to assess employees’ tendencies to either disclose or withhold inventions from their employers. The findings revealed that withholding or disclosing inventions are not simply opposite sides of the same behavior, but rather two fundamentally different behaviors: an employee might refrain from disclosing a certain invention for a variety of reasons (such as a heavy workload or the belief that the invention still requires development and is not ready to be disclosed). However, a deliberate and active decision to withhold an invention in order to prevent the transfer of ownership to the organization is a distinct behavior that may be influenced by completely different factors (for example, the employee’s feeling that they are poorly treated by the company regardless of the invention itself). Dr. Erez explains: “This distinction is extremely important for organizations seeking to address the problem. Actions taken by companies today, such as offering financial incentives or recognition to inventors, may encourage more disclosures to the organization. However, such measures may be less effective for employees who deliberately withhold a promising invention with the intention of using it further down the road, outside the organization”.

According to the researchers, this newly developed scale can serve as a foundation for further studies on the subject. Additionally, it can help employers build an effective innovation management strategy that minimizes the withholding of inventions within the organization.

Dr. Erez concludes: “In this study, we conducted an in-depth exploration of a widespread phenomenon that has long concerned legal professionals around the world, but so far has hardly been examined from a managerial perspective: employees in the business sector who withhold their inventions from the company that employs them. We urge researchers in academia to continue investigating this important topic, and call on employers to take notice: these behaviors exist, and it is crucial to address them. For our follow-up studies, we are developing management tools to help employers tackle the issue in all its complexity. We believe that with the right management strategies, it is possible to encourage disclosure and significantly reduce the withholding of inventions — preventing the need for legal battles down the line”.

Tel Aviv University Marks One Year Since October 7

TAU commemorates the victims and fallen of October 7th.

On October 7, 2024, Tel Aviv University held a solemn commemoration for the tragic events of October 7, 2023, when Hamas launched brutal attacks that left around 1,200 civilians dead and many others injured and traumatize, impacting Israel for years to come.

The event began at Smolarz Auditorium with an installation honoring TAU’s fallen members, displaying their names, pictures and affiliation with the university.

Reflecting on the installation honoring the 96 fallen members of the TAU community.

The ceremony commenced with the lowering of the flag and a moment of silence. Wreaths were laid, including one by Professor Meir Ariel from the School of Electrical Engineering at Tel Aviv University, who tragically lost his son, Dan Ariel, during the attacks at the Nova Festival.

Meir Ariel, standing over the wreath he laid for his son, Dan Ariel RIP.

In his speech, TAU President Prof. Ariel Porat reflected on the profound loss experienced by the university community: “Tel Aviv University has lost 19 of its students. Ninety-six families from the TAU community have lost immediate family members. Many more suffer physical or psychological harm. In the coming academic year, we will receive—with great awe—many students who have risked their lives so that we may live… We will do everything we can to help them, so that they can successfully study and complete the academic year. We are forever indebted to them for their courage and sacrifice”.

Daniel Zilber, head of the Tel Aviv University Student Union, spoke about the significance of this day: “Today is not just a day of remembrance; it is a day of outcry. We’re living in an absurd situation of trying to combine our civic lives with the reality of war. For us, today is not about the past; it is still the present. We’re not just remembering those who have fallen—we’re still trying to fulfill their legacy. We will commemorate them later”.

During the ceremony, friends and family members shared their memories of loved ones who were lost. Gal Itzkovitz, a student in the Social Sciences department, spoke about her dear friend Bruna Valeanu, a victim of the Nova Festival tragedy.

“I miss her terribly. She’s greatly missed at the university, in my life, and in the lives of everyone who crossed paths with her” – Gal Itzkovitz.

Gal Itzkovitz speaking about her friend, Bruna Valeanu RIP.

Itai Silber, father of Yuval Zilber, a TAU student who was killed in combat described Yuval as a compassionate leader who dedicated his life to helping others, from establishing a Scouts chapter to empowering local youth through education, all while pursuing his dream of serving as a commander in the IDF before his tragic death.

“Yuval taught me so much. I chose life. I ask everyone to choose life. Choose life with love, and ‘love thy neighbour as yourself,’ because that is the central thing” – Itai Silber.

The ceremony included the reading of the names of 96 fallen members of the Tel Aviv University community, followed by a heartfelt message from Gil Leor, a medical student and PhD candidate. He expressed solidarity with those serving in the field and their families: “I want to send strength and encouragement to our soldiers in the field and on the home front, to all the university’s reservists—students, faculty, and staff—who don’t know when or how they’ll be called back. Let’s continue to support them and their families until this war is behind us. Thank you”.

Students reading the names of the fallen members of TAU.

The event concluded with a moment of silence, counting up to 101 to acknowledge the 101 hostages who remain in Gaza.

Ending the ceremony with Shirat Hatikva.

In addition to the commemoration, the Steinhardt Museum of Natural History at Tel Aviv University hosted the “Testimony 710” project, inviting the community to engage with personal stories from the tragic events of October 7, 2023. Attendees participated in a moving screening of survivor testimonies, gaining insight into the experiences of those affected by the attack.

For full speeches and detailed coverage of the ceremony, click here.

TAU President’s Speech for October 7 Commemoration

TAU marked one year since the October 7 tragedy and the Iron Swords War.

A year has gone by since Israel went through the most terrible calamity in its history, the Jewish people’s worst disaster since the Holocaust. A year has passed, and 101 hostages are still held by Hamas in the dreadful tunnels of Gaza, with no rescue in sight. A year has passed, and almost every day we hear of more soldiers killed or wounded. A year has passed, and most evacuees, from the north and south of Israel, are still refugees in their own land.  A year has passed since that horrible Saturday, and as time goes by we discover that very few of those accountable for the bloody fiasco are willing to take responsibility.

Tel Aviv University has lost 19 of its students. 96 families from the TAU community have lost immediate family members. Many more suffer physical or psychological harm. In the coming academic year, we will receive—with great awe—many students who have risked their lives so that we may live. Some of them have been deeply scarred in their bodies or souls. We will do everything we can to help them, so that they can successfully study and complete the academic year. We are forever indebted to them for their courage and sacrifice.

In the past year, it seems, we have all swayed constantly between hope and despair. So, I wish to speak to you of some truths that, despite the numerous challenges, arouse real hope in my heart:   

The first is the exceptional personal quality of so many Israelis, especially the younger generation. Over the past year we have discovered in our society a strength we never knew we had. Even though we disagree on many issues, at the moment of truth we stand together, and do what must be done so that we can continue to live in our land.

The second truth is our military power, backed by outstanding technological capabilities. To be sure, military power is a means, not an end. And yet, in our part of the world, we probably could not exist without it. Despite their horrendous failure a year ago, Israel’s army and other security forces have been able to recover from the terrible blow and show the world that Israel is not defeated. Military power bolstered by innovative technology is the only way to keep our enemies deterred. And this advantage, we must remind anyone who needs reminding, cannot be attained or preserved without a powerful academia. We can only hope that in the future our country will choose a path in which diplomatic solutions, not only daunting military force, ensure our continued existence.

The third truth is the somewhat surprising resilience of Israeli democracy, with its institutions and civic society organizations. Without going into political controversies, I will just say that I believe that Israeli democracy, despite the cracks it has incurred, is still very strong. Anyone who believes in Israeli democracy should also believe that it will produce upstanding leaders who will lead us on the right path.

I cannot speak of hope without touching on the terrible despair of the families of our hostages in Gaza. We cannot embark upon a new path of recovery, revival and hope without bringing the hostages back to their homes. Many of us are deeply concerned that the state of Israel might not be doing everything in its power to achieve this. Freeing the hostages – who were abandoned to their fates in the dreadful fiasco of Oct. 7 – is not only a moral obligation. It is a strategic goal of the highest importance. Anyone who has served in the Israeli army is familiar with the ethos: you do not leave an injured brother-in-arms behind. Moreover, the Redemption of Captives, “pidyon shvuyim,” is an all-important Jewish commandment. Without this ethos, without solidarity as a paramount value, the state of Israel will never be the same again.

Many of us were born to parents or grandparents who came to this land before the state of Israel was established. They fought to make it a reality. Now our time has come to do whatever we can to protect this land, each in his or her own way, each according to his or her abilities.

“By October, a War Was Happening And I Was Covering a War.”

TAU international graduate thrust into the heart of national drama while working on Israeli TV.

Dheekshi Arvind, a graduate of Tel Aviv University’s MA in Security and Diplomacy program, began working as an associate producer at i24, an Israeli English-language TV channel, in September 2023, right after completing her degree. She initially took the job “to be politics-adjacent and cover news and politics in Israel and the Middle East,” as she put it, not knowing that just a month later, she would be covering one of the most significant events in recent Israeli history: the outbreak of war in October 2023.

 

“I was off work that morning, and I clearly remember hearing a loud boom. I thought it was just construction outside my apartment,” she recalls.

 

“Then my roommate banged on my door, telling me to get out because of the sirens. I couldn’t piece it together—it was so early in the morning.”

Upon realizing that Tel Aviv was under rocket attack, Arvind rushed to work. “We had a group chat at i24 where we got news before it’s broadcast. Suddenly, I was seeing updates about rockets from Gaza hitting Tel Aviv. I got a notification from the group chat: ‘We need you to come in now because we need to cover this.’”

 

Dheekshi Arvind at the TAU graduation ceremony in 2023

At first, Arvind was hesitant, questioning whether it was safe to go to work. “I remember asking people if they were staying at the job or leaving,” she says. “But my producer told me, ‘We’re journalists. We have to tell people to stay at home, but we come in for work. This is our job—covering the news is what we do.’”

And cover it they did. “That shift was a frenzy. Everyone was doing everything. Social media was blowing up, and we had so much content to post and share with the world.”

Personal and Professional Challenges

Covering the war proved to be not just a professional challenge but also a deeply personal one. Some of the October 7 victims were younger than Arvind and some of her friends were actually at the NOVA festival and had just left that morning to go somewhere else before Hamas came in. 

Arvind admits that it was difficult to process the raw footage and the information that came into the newsroom. “Seeing the footage that doesn’t make it to TV and knowing what’s actually happening on the ground—it’s hard to detach and just look at it from a research perspective.”

 

“There were so many times where I would sit with my producer—I just couldn’t handle or digest what was happening or my reaction to what I was seeing.”

 

The experience highlighted the complexity of the conflict she had studied during her degree at TAU and the challenge of conveying its nuances to a global audience, much of which viewed the situation through a polarized lens. What frustrated her most was the delayed international response. “People had access to the information, but no one said anything. It wasn’t until Israel retaliated that people started posting on Twitter and social media.”

She also felt disheartened by the oversimplified narratives that dominated discussions. In response, she wrote a blog post challenging the reductionist views she encountered. “People assumed I was taking a political side, but all I was trying to do was present a more nuanced perspective. Hamas is a terrorist organization, and I wanted to make that clear while also urging people to see the broader context.”

A Commitment Through Chaos

Working six to seven days a week, often from early morning until late at night, Arvind found the pace exhausting. But despite the pressure, she remained committed.

Arvind worked at i24 for nearly a year before returning to California, where she had previously completed her BA in political science at UCLA. As Israel’s only English-language news channel, i24 played a crucial role during the conflict. With many producers called up to serve in the Israeli army, the remaining team faced mounting demands.

 

“I knew I had to stay. We needed all hands on deck,” Arvind recalls. “People who had worked there for years were suddenly gone.”

 

“I’d made a commitment to myself, to the team and the channel, and I wanted to see it through.”

 

Her experience working with a diverse team of colleagues, including Palestinians, added another layer of complexity. “I worked with Palestinians when the war broke out, and it was fascinating to see that the common denominator wasn’t ethnicity or religion—it was people’s experiences and perspectives. The narrative isn’t as black and white as people make it out to be.”

 

“I don’t know how I got through it, but I did. And looking back, I’m glad I did.”

Victoria

Tok Corporate Centre, Level 1,
459 Toorak Road, Toorak VIC 3142
Phone: +61 3 9296 2065
Email: [email protected]

New South Wales

Level 22, Westfield Tower 2, 101 Grafton Street, Bondi Junction NSW 2022
Phone: +61 418 465 556
Email: [email protected]

Western Australia

P O Box 36, Claremont,
WA  6010
Phone: :+61 411 223 550
Email: [email protected]